I have not frequently written representatives regarding any issue, but I feel strongly on the issue of the topic known commonly as "Net Neutrality" and feel compelled to let you, as my representative in Congress, know my perspective.
I am a librarian working at Winnetka Public Library in Winnetka and I live in Northbrook. When I was hired in 1997 it was because of my knowledge of computers and of the Internet and its protocols. As part of my job it has been necessary for me to use the Internet extensively for research, web development, education, and providing basic services for the library for which I work. At home I use the Internet for communication, self-education, computer maintenance and entertainment. My Internet connection comes through AT&T from whom I also receive cable television and phone service.
In this debate on the subject of "Net Neutrality" it seems that there are several concerns expressed by corporations which provide Internet connectivity that it is necessary to institute some kind of tiered access so that limited bandwidth resources can be preserved and that applications which use a lot of bandwidth can be stopped from using excessive percentages of bandwidth. Limited Internet resources can be a problem, as many libraries with which I have contact and my own library are only too aware. However, I think that there are appropriate ways to deal with the problem and innapropriate ways to deal with the problem, and the option of implementing a tiered solution, a solution which treats different kinds of data differently, is a potentially very dangerous one going forward.
As I mentioned, libraries have had to deal with the problems of limited bandwidth. As a small library, our problems have been smaller than most. We have (by current standards) a relatively limited 1.5 Mbps T-1 line through which all of our Internet traffic goes. As part of a consortium, by necessity we need to keep our computers connected constantly to a remote server for all basic library services. We have a bank of computers which the public may use to access the Internet as well as an Internet hotspot which the public may freely use with their own equipment. We have taken two measures to make sure that our network runs smoothly: we restrict the speed of the hotspot to 256 Kbps and we reserve a portion of our bandwith for library operations if other Internet functions start to interfere.
These I think are reasonable approaches to the problem. I also think, that in the case of corporations, if they wished to implement a metered service (as has been traditionally the case with phone service) that could also be a reasonable measure. My concern is that with the limited amount of competition available, particularly in faster, cheaper, and more reliable wired services, some of the market forces which might otherwise protect the consumer cannot come into play. There are no pure "Internet Service Providers" available if a home user wants a high-bandwidth line to their home. They must use a cable company (Comcast) or a phone company (AT&T). The Internet itself offers products which compete with phone and cable services. It would only be natural in our capitalist system for companies to recognize this conflict and take measures to marginalize competition which favored one of their services over another competing service.
To use a kind of analogy with our road system. It is a reasonable thing to post a speed limit and say "all vehicles must travel no faster than 35 miles per hour, no matter what kind of car you are driving." It is also a reasonable thing to make a toll road and say "all vehicles must pay according to a set scale a fair amount based on how far you drive on our roads and how heavy your vehicle is." It is not a reasonable thing to say "cars with Illinois plates may drive 55 miles per hour on this road, but cars from other states may only go 35 miles per hour because this road is paid for largely by Illinois tax dollars."
Likewise, bits traveling from one computer to another computer should not be descriminated against because of the kind of data they carry. If the connection is slow, all bits traveling from a common source should have the same hinderances. If the connection is fast, all bits traveling from a common source should have the same advantages. It should not be an option for a company to say, "this bit is from a Microsoft update so it can go its merry way, but this bit is from a streaming video service which which I compete and so it will be a little delayed or maybe even blocked entirely."
I fear that leaving this option open will inevitably lead to companies taking advantage of it, and because of limited competition in this sphere customers will have little option but to accept it or pay more money for prioritized service. This in turn will stifle the same kind of innovation which has made the Internet such an amazing resource and a force for the free flow of information that it has been over the last decade, in spite of its faults.
I plead with you to support the Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2009 and work against any policies which would leave the fate of data in our networks vulnerable to the whim of private interests.
Why a "reluctant wizard"? It is common for my co-workers to affectionately call me a "wizard" when I have fixed some kind of technical problem. I always try to be modest about any kind of supposed powers used in solving anything, but I am stuck with the appellation in any case. It seemed like a unique and apt description of myself for this blog.
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Open Letter Regarding Net Neutrality
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
CIL 2009 Day 3 - New Tools for Metrics & Measures
All-in-all I think this was a useful session. There was a lot of stuff that wasn't that useful in it, but it was a nice discussion of usability and by the end of it I was convinced that we need to be doing more with usability. At the bare minimum I think the speakers made a very strong argument for Google Analytics, which can be installed onto the website and be used to track (broadly) user behavior on your site so you can see where they are clicking. This is something we've wondered about for a long time and I can't think it would be an entirely bad thing to look into using this to see if the way we think people use our site is indeed how they are using it.
Some other pieces of software were also mentioned that can use webcams and screen recording to track how users use the site in a more formal usability study. This is certainly something we may we may wish to consider doing and it could provide some useful information, although it would require explicit volunteers and a more concerted effort.
CIL 2009 Day 3 - What's Hot in RSS?
Z – Zoho – http://www.zoho.com – online documents
Y – YouTube RSS Search http://www.youtube.com/rss/search/???.rss (replace ??? with the thing you want to search for)
X - (he couldn't find an X)
W – WWWhatsNew – http://wwwhatsnew.com – in Spanish
V – Votes Database – http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/
U – JD Supra – http://www.jdsupra.com/
T – Tic Tocs – http://www.tictocs.ac.co.uk/ - table of contents RSS for journals
S – Scribd – http://www.scribd.com/ - YouTube for PDF files
R – Ravelry – http://www.ravelry.com/
Q – QuestionPoint - http://www.questionpoint.com
P – Page 2 RSS – http://www.page2rss.com/ - RSS feed for page with no feed
O – Open Congress – http://www.opencongress.org/ - Feeds for Thomas stuff
N – Nothing
M – Mashable – http://www.mashable.com/
L – Library Thing – http://www.librarything.com/
K – KillerStartups – http://www.killerstartups.com/
J – JustiaDockets - http://docket.justia.com/
I – I want to - http://philbradley.typepad.com/i_want_to/
H – Hunch – http://www.hunch.com/
G – Google Reader – http://reader.google.com/
F – Facebook – http://www.facebook.com/
E – eHub – http://www.emilychang.com/ehub/
D – Deepest Sender – http://deepestsender.mozdev.org/
C – Compfight – http://www.compfight.com/ - Image search (limitable to Creative Commons images)
B – Backup URL – http://www.backupurl.com/
A – Awesome Highlighter – http://www.awesomehighlighter.com/
CIL 2009 Day 3 - Mobile Library Apps
The first half discussed the University of Connecticut's use of Windows Mobile PDAs with their students. I use a PDA, and still recognize that they are a dying technology and they aren't what I think of when I hear "mobile library apps."
The second half was a whole different story. Some very bright coders from D.C. Public Library explained their process for making an iPhone application for searching their SirsiDynix catalog system allowing their patrons to look stuff up and put it on hold. That's version 1.0. They have a road map for this product going up to 2.0, and are working on plans to get the thing so you could snap a picture of a book UPC, find it in the catalog, and then put a hold on it. And they are putting the source code of this thing on their development information site. So all we need to do now is learn objective C, get an iPhone developer's account, modify the code, test the modified product, and we'd have an iPhone app.
And by the way, they also implemented SMS library notices for SirsiDynix too.
CIL 2009 Day 3 - Web 2.0 Tools for Learning and Outreach
In the second half of the presentation the use of Flickr to post PowerPoint presentations was described. This is a clever solution to a particular kind of problem which could be useful, but I don't anticipate any particular application for this in the near future.
CIL 2009 Day 3 - Learning Solutions Through Technology
The second part had some duplication with the session from yesterday that dealt with web 2.0 training methods and tips, although the speaker did make several additional points which I think have the potential to be quite useful.
CIL 2009 Day 3 - Keynote
CIL 2009 Day 2 - Dead & Innovative Tech
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
CIL 2009 Day 2 - Pecha Kucha: 2.0 Top Tips
Not much new to me was said in any of these mini-talks, and anything that would have been particularly useful, I'm afraid was just too densely packed in, although the speakers generally did an admirable job of trying to stay within their time limits. Probably the most useful talk was the one on learning the social web, which, although saying things I know I've heard before, at least said things that I could use hearing again, namely that the best way to get someone to learn something new is to get them to use it, and to get them to use it is best for them to see some value in it. In this context the speaker mentioned the social networking site Ravelry, which caters to people interested in knitting and crochet.
CIL 2009 Day 2 - Evaluating, Recommending, & Justifying 2.0 Tools
CIL 2009 Day 1 - Web 2.0 Training for Customers & Staff
CIL 2009 Day 2 - Social Network Profile Management
CIL 2009 Day 2 - The Best of the Web
CIL 2009 Day 2 - Keynote
Monday, March 30, 2009
CIL 2009 Day 1 - Library Facebook Apps
CIL 2009 Day 1 - Searching Google Earth
CIL 2009 Day 1 - 40-Plus New Tools & Gadgets for Webmasters
----
Layout Gala (blog.html.it/layoutgala) – Lots of layouts
Wave (wave.webaim.org) – Accessibility testing
HTML Table Generator (www.spectrum-research.com/V2/projects_table_generator.asp) – Generates web tables
Visual Thesaurus (www.visualthesaurus.com) – Aquabrowser like thesaurus clouds added to your website (runs in Java, seems something most appropriate to education environments)
FancyZoom (www.dfc-e.com/metiers/multimedia/opensource/jquery-fancyzoom) – Adds a Mac-like zooming to a webpage for images
Uni-Form (sprawsm.com/uni-form) – Creates a well structured, semantic, accessible and usable form
feed.informer (feed.informer.com) – widget that assists with putting feed output on your website
phplist (phplist.com) – Open-source newsletter manager. RSS to email. (!!!!!!)
EasyPHP (www.easyphp.org) – Tool for simulate and installed PHP environment.
Net.tutsplus.com/videos/screencasts/how-i-can-code-twice-as-fast-as-you/
Texter (lifehacker.com/software/texter/lifehacker-code-texter-windows-238306.php) – GPL version of ShortKeys
TextExpander (www.smileonmymac.com/TextExpander) – (Mac)
Crowd Science (crowdscience.com) – Sophisticated survey tool (looks very nice and professional)
Fusestats web analytics (www.fusestats.com) – Can generate heatmaps of your website showing where people are going and looking on your page.
Read it Later (www.ideashower.com/ideas/launched/read-it-later) - Firefox extension
Top Posts Widget (www.postrank.com) – will show what blog entries have been most popular
Internet Health Report / Internet Status Report (internethealthreport.com / internettrafficreport.com) – Helps you figure out if there's a problem on the Internet and where it might be (possibly useful for patrons asking “Why is the Internet so slow?”)
Lonely Hearts Club for Web Sites (www.google.com/friendconnect) – Allows people to friend your website.
FireShot (addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5648) – for making screen shots
FileJuicer (echoone.com/filejuicer) – get all of the images out of a PDF, Flash, or PowerPoint documents
XnView (www.enview.com/en/index.html) – allows you to convert graphics file formats to other graphics formats
ColorPicker (www.colorpicker.com) – Simple tool for picking colors and provides hex codes
Color Wizard (colorsontheweb.com/colorwizard.asp) – gives you suggestions for complimentary colors
Accessibility Color Wheel (gmazzocato.altervista.org/colorwheel/wheel.php) – shows you what a color scheme looks like for different color blindnesses
Personal Fonts (www.yourfonts.com) – Make your handwriting into a font for free
Lovely Charts (www.lovelycharts.com) – clean, elegant visualization tools
XML/SWF Charts (www.maani.us/exm_charts/index.php) – converts an arbitrary XML file into a Flash-based chart
Mind Mapping (bubbl.us) – cloud-based brainstorming tool
Mindmeister (www.mindmeister.com) – more collaborative mind mapping
script.aculo.us (demo: wiki.github.com/madrobby/scriptaculous/puzzle-demo)
xcavator (www.xcavator.net) – searches a number of different photo sites and allows you to see the results based on a particular image. You upload an image and it searches for similar images
Google Unsend (mailblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/new-in-labs-undo-send.htm) – unsend a gmail message in 5-10 seconds.
Automatically open search results in a new tab (lifehacker.com/software/firefox/firefox-tip-open-search-results-in-a-new-tab-255171.php)
Review Basics (www.reviewbasics.com) – Collaborative document reviewing
Quintura Kids (quinturakids.com) – filtered kidsafe searching
Virus Total (www.virustotal.com) – detects trojans in a file
WinDirStat (windirstat.info) – see what's using up space on a drive
LetsCallMe (letscallme.com) – hides your phone number but lets people call you
DamnIT (damnit.jupiterit.com) – Sends you an email when something goes wrong with javascript
Chunk It! (www.getchunkit.com)
net.tutsplus.com – tutorials
www.designer-daily.com/mac-apps-1915) -free mac applications
noupe.com
homokaasu.org/rasterbator (make an image poster sized)
CIL 2009 Day 1 - Omnipresence Without Spending a Dime
Curt Tagtmeier from Fremont Public Library District presented on how he used a free service called mobiSiteGalore to create a cell-phone friendly version of their website. It's certainly an idea worth considering for our own site, although we'd need to limit it to the core of the site and what someone would want to do on a phone. This mainly has traditional cell-phones in mind. Smart phones, like the iPhone, generally do a capable job of browsing normal websites.
CIL 2009 Day 1 - Website Redesign Pitfalls
CIL 2009 Day 1 - Key Note
In 2000 46% of adults were using the Internet. 5% with broadband. 50% owned a cell phone. Less than 10% used “cloud” computing applications.
2008: 75% of adults were using the Internet. 57% have broadband. 82% own a cell phone. 62% connect to the Internet wirelessly. 53% use “cloud” applications.
These changes have had these effects in the ecosystems of everyday people.
Volume of information has gown
Variety of information has increased
Velocity of information is faster (you find out things, both on a national and person level, faster).
The times and places to experience media enlarge.
People's vigilance for information expands and contracts. (As people gain new interests they...)
The immersive qualities of media are more compelling.
Relevance of information improves.
The number of information “voices” explodes and becomes more findable.
Voting and ventilating are enabled
Social networks (not necessarily online) are more vivid (in an environment where all of this stuff is happening, people are falling back on their social networks to help them cope).
Homo Connectus
Different sense of
Expectation about access to information
Place and distance
Opportunities to play
Time use
Personal efficacy
Social networking possibilities
39% of those surveyed in a recent Pew Internet survey are motivated by mobility (love it and feel good about tech)
61% are tied to stationary media (ambivalent about tech)
10 groups in the greater population (5 excited about tech, 5 ambivalent about tech)
Digital Collaborators (8%)
People at the cutting edge (blogging, tweeting, always online, etc.) Gen X group
Libraries just need to be a place for them to connect to the Internet. They can influence.
Ambivalent Networkers (7%)
Younger (Gen Y). Use the Internet but less excited about it. Don't rely on e-mail as much as texting
Libraries can be a sanctuary where they can go offline. Gaming is important to them. Libraries can help them deal with Information Overload.
Media Movers (7% of population)
Like putting photos online, etc. (The people who are always sending links, etc.)
Libraries can help them find outlets for sharing their creations. Help them navigate to material they can pass along.
Roving nodes (9% of population)
People who could not give up their email & cell phone. Feel that technology gives them control. Largely female population. (sounds like a Winnetka group)
Help them to be efficient. Give them access to technology. They are candidates to learn about cloud computing.
Mobile Newbies (8% of the population)
New to cell phones. Love them deeply. Largely a female group and the oldest group in the Mobile set. Don't know much or care much about the Internet.
How-to-material, coaching and mentoring are services they can use. They would like tech support.
Desktop Veterans (13% of the population)
Internet veterans. Mobility doesn't matter. 2004 was an awesome year. Cell phones are used for phone calls.
Offer good computers with good connections. Self sufficient. May want tutorials on content creation.
Drifting Surfers (14% of the population)
Largely female. Attitudes on technology have worsened ove r the past two years.
Would like tech support. Traditional library services
Information Encumbered (10% of the population)
Largely male. Angry about information overload. Get ticked off when things break down.
Don't force things on them. Provide sympathy. Be filters and provide good support.
Tech Indifferent
Not internet users. Some cell users.
Computers & Internet 101, but don't force them
Off the Network (14% of the population)
People who used to do things online but don't anymore (often). Love old media. Affordability is an issue.
Traditional services big. Maybe some tutorials.
Roles for libraries:
Pathways to problem-solving information
Pathways to personal enrichment
Pathways to entertainment
Pathways to new kinds of social networks built around people, media, and institutions
Pathways to the wisdom of crowds, so you can fill your own future here...
CIL 2009
I haven't seen him around yet, but I've confirmed that David got here safely via email. After this morning's keynote on "Freeing Libraries: The Nodes in People's Social Networks" by Lee Rainie my plans for today tentatively include these sessions:
- Website Redesign Pitfalls
- Help Your Library Be Omnipresent Without Spending a Dime (a staff member from Fremont will be presenting here)
- 40-Plus New Tools & Gadgets for Library Webmasters
- Searching Google Earth
- Library Facebook Applications